🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since that time, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a source of worry. At the same time, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to scrub African American heritage and experience from the archives is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the conditions of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.